Intervalsconfidence 0.88

5 × 300m

Colin Dismuke50 km / marathon build

Source: own Strava export

Decoded
Intervals
5 × 300m
Distance
17.0 km
Moving
71:48
Rep pace
3:16/km
Avg HR
163 bpm
Reps
5
Planned vs actual · TrainingPeaksPlanned 1:21:00 · 18.8 kmRan 1:11:48 · 17.0 kmIF 1.38TSS 225
Shape of the sessionEasyWorkFastest
warm up
cool down
0:005 × work / float71:48
The decode

Five one-minute fast reps with one-minute recoveries formed the opening block of an interval sandwich. The session then demanded a controlled shift into half-marathon effort, a faster middle segment, and a return to sustained pace, making the transitions as important as the speed.

The five reps stayed tightly grouped between 3:13/km and 3:19/km as heart rate rose from 153 to 171, while recovery heart rate reached 176. The sustained work ran at 3:49/km, 3:35/km and 3:46/km, with heart rate at 176, 184 and 179; the closing block was faster than the first.

Rep splits

RepTimePaceHRFloat
11:003:13/km1531:00
21:003:17/km1621:00
31:003:15/km1711:00
41:003:19/km1701:00
51:003:17/km1711:00
0.88
confidence

What the engine saw

  • 5 work intervals detected from lap markers, confirmed by clear pace separation.
  • Recoveries average 60s.
  • Matches the athlete's own session label.

Calibration flags

  • Running power threshold estimated from the athlete's half-marathon best efforts (60-min power 476 W, 95% of 20-min power 460 W). Treat power zones and load as ±3%.
  • Zones and running threshold are one snapshot, read 2 Jul 2026 and applied to every session in the archive. An older session is scored against today's zones, not the zones the athlete trained with then.

Engine read · editorial decode by Splits

Time in zone

Heart rate
Z1
Recovery7%
Z2
Endurance24%
Z3
Tempo22%
Z4
Threshold9%
Z5
VO₂max38%
Pace
Z1
Easy39%
Z2
Endurance15%
Z3
Tempo31%
Z4
Threshold10%
Z5
VO₂max3%
Z6
Speed1%
Power
Z1
Recovery0%
Z2
Endurance16%
Z3
Tempo38%
Z4
Threshold42%
Z5
VO₂max4%
Z6
Anaerobic0%
Z7
Neuro0%
Aerobic decoupling · Pa:HR+1.4%
Effort & efficiency
0.86
Running effectiveness
speed per watt/kg, reps
5.9 w/kg
Power-to-weight
rep average
2.57
Efficiency factor
norm. power per bpm
1.03
Variability index
1.0 = perfectly even power
1.0%
Rep consistency
pace spread across reps, lower is tighter
1959 kJ
Total work
mechanical energy
1220 kcal
Energy
estimated burn
775 bpk
Cardiac cost
heartbeats per km
47%
Above threshold
≥ 164 bpm (Z4+)
-0:32/km
Split balance
negative split, faster 2nd half
Conditions-adjusted pace26°C · +40 m
Actual
3:16/km
Grade-adjusted
3:16/km
Heat-adjusted
3:08/km
−8s/km
True effort
3:08/km
−8s/km

The rep pace re-expressed for flat ground and cool air, the effort, not the clock. The gap between actual and true effort is the day's hidden work: conditions were taxing the clock.

More decodes