Intervalsconfidence 0.88

6 × 3.5min on / 1.5min off

10min steady 6 × 3.5min on / 1.5min off

Colin Dismuke50 km / marathon build

Source: own Strava export

Decoded
Intervals
6 × 3.5min on / 1.5min off
Distance
14.4 km
Moving
60:43
Rep pace
3:34/km
Avg HR
157 bpm
Reps
6
Shape of the sessionEasyWorkFastest
warm up
cool down
0:006 × work / float60:43
The decode

This is a classic VO₂ / threshold-VO₂ session: a 15-minute warm-up into a 10-minute steady block, then the main set, six 3.5-minute efforts off 90-second floats. The on-reps sit at and just above threshold power, around 455–480 W against a ~465 W running threshold, near 3:35/km, so this is top-end aerobic power work, the gear a 50 km build rarely gets from long aerobic days. The 10-minute steady primer is the tell: it pre-fatigues the system so the reps start from an already-elevated place, closer to race-day cumulative load.

Execution was controlled and even. The reps clustered around 3:35/km before a 3:28 close, with heart rate climbing in a tidy staircase from 171 to 176 and never spiking. Time in Z4–Z5 totals roughly 38% of the session, exactly where this workout should live. Power tracked pace cleanly with no fade in the back half, and the floats held a true 90 seconds. Aerobic decoupling was minimal, the second half kept the first half's efficiency, which is the signature of a session finished under control rather than emptied out.

Two things to sharpen. The first reps were a touch conservative before the legs woke up on the last one; distributing that effort earlier would buy more honest time at VO₂. And for a 50 km build specifically, the next progression is duration over intensity, the same shape at 4–5 minutes on would push it toward the sustained strength the distance actually demands. As a top-end stimulus inside an aerobic block, though, this is well-judged work.

Rep splits

RepTimePaceHRFloat
13:303:31/km1711:30
23:303:35/km1751:30
33:303:36/km1741:30
43:203:36/km1741:30
53:303:35/km1751:30
63:303:28/km1761:30

Pace & heart rate

PaceHeart rate
0.88
confidence

What the engine saw

  • 6 work intervals detected from lap markers, confirmed by clear pace separation.
  • Recoveries average 90s.
  • Matches the athlete's own session label.

Calibration flags

  • Running power threshold estimated from the athlete's half-marathon best efforts (60-min power 476 W, 95% of 20-min power 460 W). Treat power zones and load as ±3%.

Engine read · editorial decode by Splits

Time in zone

Heart rate
Z1
Recovery28%
Z2
Endurance11%
Z3
Tempo22%
Z4
Threshold15%
Z5
VO₂max23%
Pace
Z1
Easy32%
Z2
Endurance28%
Z3
Tempo14%
Z4
Threshold19%
Z5
VO₂max5%
Z6
Speed2%
Power
Z1
Recovery0%
Z2
Endurance9%
Z3
Tempo39%
Z4
Threshold49%
Z5
VO₂max3%
Z6
Anaerobic0%
Z7
Neuro0%
Aerobic decoupling · Pa:HR+3.9%
Effort & efficiency
0.78
Running effectiveness
speed per watt/kg, reps
6.0 w/kg
Power-to-weight
rep average
2.71
Efficiency factor
norm. power per bpm
1.02
Variability index
1.0 = perfectly even power
1.4%
Rep consistency
pace spread across reps, lower is tighter
1602 kJ
Total work
mechanical energy
962 kcal
Energy
estimated burn
693 bpk
Cardiac cost
heartbeats per km
39%
Above threshold
≥ 164 bpm (Z4+)
-0:39/km
Split balance
negative split, faster 2nd half
Conditions-adjusted pace22°C · +37 m
Actual
3:33/km
Grade-adjusted
3:34/km
+1s/km
Heat-adjusted
3:28/km
5s/km
True effort
3:28/km
5s/km

The rep pace re-expressed for flat ground and cool air, the effort, not the clock. The gap between actual and true effort is the day's hidden work: conditions were taxing the clock.

More decodes

Why this exists

This is one opted-in athlete. Imagine a roster.

Every chart on this page came from data the athlete chose to share. The public hub covers what pros publish; this depth exists when an athlete opts in.